Not So Young But Angry Conservatives Unite

Getting sick of the progressively worse slant and obvious bias of the media? Got booted out of other sites for offending too many liberals? Make this your home. If you SPAM here, you're gone. Trolling? Gone. Insult other posters I agree with. Gone. Get the pic. Private sanctum, private rules. No Fairness Doctrine and PC wussiness tolerated here..... ECCLESIASTES 10:2- The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Pre-Emptive Smear Job

Well, well, the lefties are drawing first blood.....

Apparently, some so-called concerned citizen decided to make a film about "the real Rudy Guiliani." Rudy is known as the Mayor on 9/11, the man who helped clean up New York, but this film would have you believe he was the devil incarnate.

Yes, Rudy did cheat on his wife. Yes, he did get abrasive. However, does that merit the new nicknames, Nazi Guiliani, Racist Rudy, and Il Duce De New York? To the self-righteous Village Voice, aka Brokeback Gazette, it does. Oddly enough, Rudy never waged war on same-sex folks, but some of his biggest critics are same-sex types.

Rudy is also expected to be shown as an uncaring racist for the NYPD shooting of Amidou Diallo and the NYPD torture of Patrick Doresmond. Diallo, shot several times, was shot at night, thought to be holding a gun. Doresmond, sodomized and beaten by cops. Did Rudy order that? Al Sharpton and Louis Farrahkhan thought so. Oddly enough, despite all this, Rudy was still a popular mayor.

Rudy isn't running in 2008, that we know of. He has not announced candidacy for the NY Senate, let alone President. Why the pre-emptive strike?

Simple, Rudy would be likely to be ran, as most of the GOP has no-names. Rudy like it or not is moderate enough to get a majority of the vote. He was a conservative on terrorism, law enforcement, and the war in Iraq. Guiliani is moderate on education, spending, and on same-sex unions. Why strike him? If he ran, he could win. OR, second reason, Hillary still has a score to settle and while not directly implicated, she probably gave a subtle blessing to smear Rudy. No one crosses Madame Hillary and fares too well, ask Vince Foster.

Well, all this can do is probably strengthen Rudy and alienate the majority from these whackjobs. Smear away, you losers. Your Michael Moore worked soooooo well in getting Bush unseated, oh wait, he won.

Desperate much?


  • At 12:54 AM, Blogger Kevin said…

    I don't really care who says what about Rudy - but your 3rd paragraph is just disappointing to say the least.

    Rudy undoubtedly did good and bad things for NYC. The handling of those two men's deaths were bad things. If you can't see that, I don't know what to tell ya.

    Doresmond, sodomized and beaten by cops. Did Rudy order that?

    No, but he outright defended it. In fact if I recall, he tried to make up a case how Dorismond was a criminal, which just wasn't true. Ironically the man was actually a rent-a-cop of some kind at the time.

    I moved to NYC 2 months after Amadou Diallo was filled with bullets. Again, not caring about this movie - Rudy WAS an uncaring racist. I don't know if he still is, but he certainly was.

  • At 9:33 PM, Blogger Christopher King said…

    Exactly. He was no saint, and he pretty much tried to shit on the art world whenever he could, but I believe he lost EVERY SINGLE TIME; just trying to push the envelope a skoonch more to the right.

    Similar to what they did in Cincinnati as noted in this Dennis BarrieRobert Mapplethorpe entry.

  • At 6:31 PM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    Uncaring racist, waaaaa. Yeah and Al Sharpton cried real tears for Dorismond and Diallo. He used those two. Prove Rudy was racist, you pack of dipshits. Oh, it's OK if you're an Italian, but just a Democrat. You're not fooling anyone.

    And the art world, is really desparate to have a crucifix submerged in piss as an art exhibit. Gimme a break you twerps.

  • At 9:03 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    There wasn't anything said about Al Sharpton.

    The comment simply said that Rudy DID appear to be a racist regarding the deaths of those two completely innocent and otherwise harmless men.

    And prove it? Well that's just silly ND, isn't it?

    I said he did good AND bad things. Can you possibly really think he handled those two incidents like a leader should have?


Post a Comment

<< Home