San Diego to ACLU: We're Keeping our Memorial Cross, Shove It!
Read this and focus on the arrogant attorney.
After 15 years of adverse court rulings, the citizens of San Diego voted to save the city's historic Mt. Soledad cross.
The conflict arises from an ACLU lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the 29-foot concrete structure, which has been the center of a war memorial on city land since 1954.
According to an unofficial count, 75 percent of voters decided they want to transfer the city owned site to the federal government where it would be designated as a war memorial.
A memorial there since 1954, and the ACLU wants it gone. Not shocking. Bravo to the MAJORITY of Californians who are sick and tired of the ACLU and its godless stance.
The ACLU's beef, the federal government SHOULD NOT have any crosses or other religious paraphenalia as it may be an implicit endorsement of religion. I suppose the ACLU would love to take white out to the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution as God is mentioned in there. Too bad, most of the US sees these snakes as what they really are.
The Anti-American, godless, disgusting ambulance chasers who really need to take this hint: WE DON'T GIVE A FLYING F#CK WHAT YOU THINK, WE ARE THE MAJORITY, HEAR WHAT WE THINK! YOU TRY AND TAKE OUT OUR MEMORIALS, ROWS OF WAR CROSSES AND OTHER HALLOWED MEMORIALS, YOU WILL PAY AND WE WILL FIGHT YOU!
Hold on, there's more:
But ACLU attorney James McElroy insists the vote is meaningless.
"It still doesn't mean a damn thing," he said, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune. "Voters should have never voted on it. It's a waste of taxpayers' money."
This worthless scum is angry because the vote went against him and his client. It doesn't matter, since it's not what you think, right Jimmy? F#CK YOU.
The battle began in 1989 when Phillip Paulsen, an atheist, filed suit, and a court ordered the city to remove the cross. San Diego responded by placing the property up for sale, with the approval of 76 percent of voters. But the subsequent sale was ruled unconstitutional after Paulsen objected, arguing the sale had the effect of preserving the cross.
Paulsen is welcome to leave the US if he hates the fact that about 75% of the US is religious. Did Paulsen even fight in the war? Or is he some stupid hippy reject who hates everything. Bet this ass isn't even married. Paulsen, take a hint, LEAVE.
Paulsen argues that the cross is a violation of the First Amendment's ban on government establishment of a religion
Point out the section, because it doesn't exist. The church did not establish a church, they put up a memorial which is a cross, which is a memorial to many who were also Christian. Do you think we should remove the rows of white crosses also? Probably.
Here's something I have to say to the pushy and militant atheists and God haters. Shut up. Just leave us alone. If you hate religion, form your own part of the world and move there. I hear North Korea is pretty nice this year. Also, if you think you can whine and ruin this country, because your hate for God and the fact God didn't choose to fulfill your selfish desires, think again. We're not budging and we're sick of your crap.
We know you don't believe in God. And you are in for a shock when he meets you, and you don't go to Heaven. Enjoy explaining your hate then, Paulsen, McEllroy and the other godless punks of this world.