Not So Young But Angry Conservatives Unite

Getting sick of the progressively worse slant and obvious bias of the media? Got booted out of other sites for offending too many liberals? Make this your home. If you SPAM here, you're gone. Trolling? Gone. Insult other posters I agree with. Gone. Get the pic. Private sanctum, private rules. No Fairness Doctrine and PC wussiness tolerated here..... ECCLESIASTES 10:2- The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.

Thursday, July 28, 2005

San Diego to ACLU: We're Keeping our Memorial Cross, Shove It!

Well, the ACLU won't like this. San Diego citizens overwhelmingly voted to keep a war memorial that is a cross from being bulldozed, by order of the ACLU.

Read this and focus on the arrogant attorney.

After 15 years of adverse court rulings, the citizens of San Diego voted to save the city's historic Mt. Soledad cross.
The conflict arises from an ACLU lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the 29-foot concrete structure, which has been the center of a war memorial on city land since 1954.
According to an unofficial count, 75 percent of voters decided they want to transfer the city owned site to the federal government where it would be designated as a war memorial.


A memorial there since 1954, and the ACLU wants it gone. Not shocking. Bravo to the MAJORITY of Californians who are sick and tired of the ACLU and its godless stance.

The ACLU's beef, the federal government SHOULD NOT have any crosses or other religious paraphenalia as it may be an implicit endorsement of religion. I suppose the ACLU would love to take white out to the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution as God is mentioned in there. Too bad, most of the US sees these snakes as what they really are.

The Anti-American, godless, disgusting ambulance chasers who really need to take this hint: WE DON'T GIVE A FLYING F#CK WHAT YOU THINK, WE ARE THE MAJORITY, HEAR WHAT WE THINK! YOU TRY AND TAKE OUT OUR MEMORIALS, ROWS OF WAR CROSSES AND OTHER HALLOWED MEMORIALS, YOU WILL PAY AND WE WILL FIGHT YOU!

Hold on, there's more:

But ACLU attorney James McElroy insists the vote is meaningless.
"It still doesn't mean a damn thing," he said, according to the San Diego Union-Tribune. "Voters should have never voted on it. It's a waste of taxpayers' money."


This worthless scum is angry because the vote went against him and his client. It doesn't matter, since it's not what you think, right Jimmy? F#CK YOU.

The battle began in 1989 when Phillip Paulsen, an atheist, filed suit, and a court ordered the city to remove the cross. San Diego responded by placing the property up for sale, with the approval of 76 percent of voters. But the subsequent sale was ruled unconstitutional after Paulsen objected, arguing the sale had the effect of preserving the cross.

Paulsen is welcome to leave the US if he hates the fact that about 75% of the US is religious. Did Paulsen even fight in the war? Or is he some stupid hippy reject who hates everything. Bet this ass isn't even married. Paulsen, take a hint, LEAVE.

Paulsen argues that the cross is a violation of the First Amendment's ban on government establishment of a religion

Point out the section, because it doesn't exist. The church did not establish a church, they put up a memorial which is a cross, which is a memorial to many who were also Christian. Do you think we should remove the rows of white crosses also? Probably.

Here's something I have to say to the pushy and militant atheists and God haters. Shut up. Just leave us alone. If you hate religion, form your own part of the world and move there. I hear North Korea is pretty nice this year. Also, if you think you can whine and ruin this country, because your hate for God and the fact God didn't choose to fulfill your selfish desires, think again. We're not budging and we're sick of your crap.

We know you don't believe in God. And you are in for a shock when he meets you, and you don't go to Heaven. Enjoy explaining your hate then, Paulsen, McEllroy and the other godless punks of this world.

9 Comments:

  • At 1:06 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    Well, see, here ya go Nick, here is one of the other topics I sort of agree with you on.

    As you are aware, I am fully against the government imposing religion upon people. However, I do not see this particular memorial as doing that in any way.

    Now, if someone had wanted to erect a giant Star of David as an addition to the memorial and it was turned down, I would find that to be wrong (at least if the memorial encompassed Jewish deaths too).

    But much like your comments on the white crosses at the cemetary (I supposed you meant at Arlington), they serve individual purposes, and I believe that is the difference here.

    To explain why I don't feel I am contradicting myself, a courthouse (for example) is supposed to be there for everyone. Not just jews, nor christians, nor muslims. Therefore, religious material related to the courthouse imposes upon those peoples different beliefs. Particularly, it is supposed to be a place where everyone has an equal chance, and branding it with a religion suggests to a person they may not be getting that equal chance (if they are of a different religion).

    A memorial, however, serves to stand in honor of those fallen. If a cross serves the memorial well, then so be it. Bear in mind, however, that if a bunch of Buddhists do something prolific for our country and a memorial is made in their honor, you can't complain when there is a giant Buddah statue somewhere =]

     
  • At 1:42 PM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    They wanna tear down Buddha, Star of David, and yes even an Islamic memorial, then I would be ticked.

    Agreeing? Why is that so frightening Kev? Middle ground is good ground.

     
  • At 4:41 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    Agreed.

    But as I have said, I generally think some of your visions are much more to the right of me and hence I disagree with them.

    I just try to be fair, to all people. It's hard, but I think it can be done in time.

     
  • At 5:23 PM, Blogger Mooneyguy said…

    I see that San Diego has a lesbian mayor. How cool is that?

     
  • At 6:46 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    That is always nice to see.

     
  • At 8:50 AM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    Houston had a lesbian council member, and NY have a lesbian Senator......

    What's new?

     
  • At 2:55 PM, Blogger owdbob said…

    Chucky SLUMMER is a LEZBO? WOW just like me.

     
  • At 9:43 AM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    ROFLMAO @ Chucky Slummer. At least San Diego doesn't have Mayor White-wash. Bill White is a complete moron. Talks out of both sides of his mouth. Said he'd strengthen law enforcement, then cut the HPD budgets and fired jail employees, necessitating cops to pull double overtime or even triple shifts.....

    Also, Mayor White, moron that he is said he'd help our city and the roadwork and it's doubled. Moron shouldn't have made promises he could not keep.

     
  • At 3:03 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    Nick,

    Thought you'd like to see this picture taken from the state capital grounds:

    A picture for Nick

    I would just have assumed back a truck into it, but its on state property and I think the granite is pretty nice to look at.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home