Not So Young But Angry Conservatives Unite

Getting sick of the progressively worse slant and obvious bias of the media? Got booted out of other sites for offending too many liberals? Make this your home. If you SPAM here, you're gone. Trolling? Gone. Insult other posters I agree with. Gone. Get the pic. Private sanctum, private rules. No Fairness Doctrine and PC wussiness tolerated here..... ECCLESIASTES 10:2- The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

End Life Unworthy of Living, says Anglican Bishop

Well, now we've seen full circle. It appears that the Nazis weren't all killed off, they just took over the Church of England and advocate killing crippled and deformed babies straight off.....

Read it and weep.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=416003&in_page_id=1770

There's much much more.

Doctors pushed this measure, advocating death. Nice to know Joseph Mengele had some bastards to carry on his fine work.

England is in the abyss, they're done for.

14 Comments:

  • At 9:09 AM, Blogger Kevin said…

    'Puberty at eight months'

    ...is this the right article you were referring to?

     
  • At 9:17 AM, Blogger Mooneyguy said…

    Yeah, newborns with no chance of surviving should be kept alive to suffer as long as humanly possible. Thta's the compassionate position.

    On a cheerier note, senate Democrats are selecting majority leaders today. Isn't that nice?

     
  • At 4:03 PM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    Kev, WTF are you reading?

    Moonshine, why don't you volunteer and starve the unborn, you fucking Nazi? You fuckin Mengele reject! Burn in fuckin hell!

    the only goddamn people not opposed to euthanasia are alive and supposedly unflawed.

    FUCK YOU!

     
  • At 4:24 PM, Blogger Marshall Art said…

    Don't expend too much emotion on the little cretin, Nick. Buffooney's value is in his stupidity and the entertainment it provides. He's as deep as a wet spot on the sidewalk so he's unable to envision the possible abuses of such a policy, and he's too self-centered to see the immorality of it. This is perfect for the self-centered who aren't to be bothered with the negative outcomes of their actions. Just pitch it. If it happens to be human life, so what? Don't have time for that shit. We'll just say we're being compassionate as if we're putting down a lame horse. Let's forget all those who were given no chance and went on to greatness. After all, when it suits us, doctors are perfect. If mooney really cared at all about anyone but himself, he'd abort himself.

     
  • At 5:16 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    lol - apparently the first time I copied and pasted the link - it truncated the article ID to 4160

    this is what comes up:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=4160

    ..hence the question

     
  • At 7:11 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    Well now that I've read the article, I think you might be exaggerating just a bit ND.

    I mean, even you can make plenty of counterpoints to this one. It's not about killing a baby - it's just about when and/or how to save one.

    I can assure you that thousands of babies will die tonight all around the world because their families lack the money to sufficiently pay for their health care. Take the most extreme cases of course coming from Africa.

    You know this, and yet you're not contributing to their lives, nor are you going to contribute after reading this.

    Having said that though, I'm not wanting to pick on you or anything - but rather just make the case that we make the choice NOT to save babies every day of our lives - it's just behind the scenes and so it doesn't matter to anyone.

    ...bring it into the limelight and it becomes controversy.

    If you want to contest that, you think we can't raise the money to bring the infant mortality rate to almost 0% around the world? Do some math on it.

    I'm not advocating NOT saving babies, as I think children SHOULD be given medical treatment - but it's not without some hypocrisy to criticize what he is saying.

     
  • At 9:02 AM, Blogger Mooneyguy said…

    ND, nothing in that article suggests killing babies. What they say is that before 22 weeks the child cannot survive, so why waste valuable resources trying to save it? Or do you just like to see little children suffer?

     
  • At 4:39 PM, Blogger Marshall Art said…

    Kevin,

    You draw a weak comparison by bringing up impoverished nations. It's totally apples and oranges. It's one thing to have nations without the resources to care for infants, it's quite another to be in the midst of medical care as the time following a delivery, and then withdraw that care. It contradicts the Hypocratic Oath to do so. It also assumes that doctors have the omnipotence to make such life/death decisions. Dennis Prager uses an illustration of firemen making suggestions for fire prevention based on their constant immersion in the issue as firemen. Many of their suggestions would be unreasonable to the average person because the average person isn't exposed to fires and fire prevention 24/7 as are the firemen. The same goes for doctors. Though they see the worst that can happen more often than the average person, it's that exposure that skews their opinion making process regarding how things as saving babies' lives should be formulated. Secondly, the only persons who should have any say in whether or not care should be given is the parents of the child. Thirdly, no doctor should ever make a decision of life/death by considering the cost. That kind of doctor I want no where near me or my family. Finally, suffering is not the ultimate indicator of compassion or lack thereof. Survival is. The suffering may dissipate and most likely will to some extent. But hey, mooney, the next time you have a headache, feel free to kill yourself.

     
  • At 5:00 PM, Blogger Mooneyguy said…

    Thanks for your support, MA. I'm always happy to see you socialists spending other people's money...especially when it's guaranteed to be totally wasted.

    Babies born before 23 weeks cannot survive. Period.

     
  • At 10:17 AM, Blogger Marshall Art said…

    Leave it to buffooney to take the most souless route. How typical that such a cretin would find it too expensive to save a child's life, that such a contemptable human being would be put out in anyway to save a life at all. What a complete chucklehead to draw a conclusion where I am responsible for spending the money of the parents who wish to save their own child. He would prefer that those parents have no say in whether efforts should be put forth on behalf of their own children. No. That's somehow the doctors' decision. Or even worse, his. Cartooney would also insist that there's absolutely no hope for a pre-23 week child when embryos are kept alive for harvesting purposes. No. There's no way medical technology can handle that. Yeah. Right. If there's anyone with the least right to determine who deserves life or efforts to preserve it, that cocksucker would be mooney. Anytime you feel like offering even an opinion on the subject, you reprehensible thief of space, slap the crap out of yourself.

     
  • At 12:37 PM, Blogger Mooneyguy said…

    MA, get real. The child's life cannot be saved no matter how hard you clap. How tough is it to understand reality? Why spend money and force an infant to endure hideous pain when there is zero chance of survival? Face reality...

     
  • At 11:14 PM, Blogger Marshall Art said…

    Punyguy,

    How hard is it to understand that the decision isn't yours to make? Are you so arrogant as to believe you can decide what others should or would be willing to attempt for the sake of their child? If you want to allow the premature product of your union with your favorite barnyard animal to die, that's your business. You don't even care about the lives of such children anyway, so why bother to post your very, very stupid opinions on the subject?

     
  • At 4:54 PM, Blogger Mooneyguy said…

    You forget that I'm married to a physician. She tells me that this decision is the right one. I'll go with medical science on this and not waste money (and cause pain and suffering) on a lost cause.

    I tell you what, Marshall; take an egg out of your refrigerator and hatch it. I'll wait...

     
  • At 11:15 PM, Blogger Marshall Art said…

    Good for her. What makes you think that means anything? The British medical people already made the same bullshit opinion, so what? Does your wife deal with research in this area? Does she know the minutia of every specialty? Medical science hasn't made this decision the right one, some doctors playing God made a subjective opinion. They are entitled to make them, but the decision is NOT their's to make. THAT'S the point! It's not their decision, it's not their money. Causes are lost when losers like yourself give up. Causes are lost when selfish cocksuckers like yourself feel it's not worth the effort. I'll tell YOU what; take an egg out of your refrigerator and shove it up your ass if there's enough room with your head up there.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home