Not So Young But Angry Conservatives Unite

Getting sick of the progressively worse slant and obvious bias of the media? Got booted out of other sites for offending too many liberals? Make this your home. If you SPAM here, you're gone. Trolling? Gone. Insult other posters I agree with. Gone. Get the pic. Private sanctum, private rules. No Fairness Doctrine and PC wussiness tolerated here..... ECCLESIASTES 10:2- The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Munich Sellout Part II: Gaza handed to terrorists

1944- Jewish flunky is in dark coat, hat, pushes other Jews out of home, gets them onto the trains to Auschwitz. They ignore the cries and wailing, but get their fellow Jews to the Nazis, so they may live longer...... Those who do so are KAPOS.

2005- Jewish flunkies sell out majority of their own. Employ own troops to get them out of homes to Israel, but more or less a delayed execution at the hands of Hamas. They too ignore the wailing and crying of their fellow Jews. These are the reluctant IDF troops, but they too will be KAPOS.

What's the difference? Just hats and locations. These guys are doing the others dirty work for them.

"An appeaser is someone who feeds an alligator his own, and hopes he gets eaten, last."- Winston Churchill.

"If you get the Jews out of Gaza, the terrorism will stop!"- Cindy Sheehan, 2005.

"Peace in our time...."- Neville Chamberlain, 1938.

What the hell is going on?

First, Israeli PM Ariel Sharon is having the Israeli Army and police move Israeli settlers from territory it had been given since 1948. Now, they must move due to mounting pressure from the PLO, Egypt, Jordan, other Arab states, and shockingly The White House (once pro Israel) is pushing this initiative.

LINKS: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050816/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/sept__11_newspaper_1

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,165827,00.html

And now Sharon is sending in Israeli troops to yank Jewish settlers out of their homes. Wow, if this doesn't sound familiar, like World War II and the Nazis, what would be?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4155184.stm

And of course, while some think this will quell terrorism, think again. Hamas chiefs said the war will continue regardless of the Jews being removed....

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4148732.stm

Good call Sharon! Good call Sheehan! Bush, and other so-called allies, again you never cease to disappoint, and this hurts worse. Didn't you once count yourselves as allies of the Israelis? Weren't you on the White House lawn and at 10 Downing echoing your support for the right of Israel's existence? Apparently no longer....

Were the 30 pieces of silver, or 30 million barrels of oil worth it, boys?

9 Comments:

  • At 1:11 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    Well, I don't necessarily agree with the whole situation, but then again I think the Isreal / Pal thing is so fucked up in the first place, that anything different is better.

    I'd like to add that the US has certainly helped to fuck up the situation over the past 60 years.

    In addition, your opinions are slightly without facts:

    Right now the current population of Gaza is about 1.3 Palestinians and a mere 8,000 Jews. I am not saying that the 8,000 should just be removed, but it's a pretty significant figure.

    Also, I believe I read that they are not just being kicked out, per se, but have been offered some sort of financial compensation to move. In many ways, somewhat like the eminent domain thing. I still think that's wrong, but lets just not misconstrue the facts into what they are not.

     
  • At 4:28 PM, Blogger Kevin said…

    sorry, there was obviously supposed to be 'million' after that 1.3 figure.

    ...as in 1.3 million Palestinians in Gaza

     
  • At 4:48 PM, Blogger owdbob said…

    Isreal spilt Blood for GAZA they should keep it. Spoils of WAR and that SHIT.

     
  • At 5:40 PM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    Kevin, I understand your want and priority in trying to calm the sitch here, but tell that to the Jews. They've been kicked out and expelled out of every land.

    Here's an uncanny coincidence. About this time of year, 137 AD or 138 AD, the Romans sacked Jerusalem, expelling the Jews. 1290 AD, King Richard expels the Jews from England. 1492 AD, The Spanish expel their Jews also. August 1939, the Germans were setting up more and more cncentration camps.

    If I was a Jew, I'd be nervous and have every right to be.

    Understand their past, 5000 years of persecution and torment and slavery. The Muslims came along about 1400 years ago. Notice the disparity?

     
  • At 9:50 PM, Blogger Admin said…

    Kevin, it'd be un-fucked up real fast if we treated Israel like allies and not like redheaded stepkids.

     
  • At 12:34 AM, Blogger Kevin said…

    Well sure, but also tell that to the Palestinians regarding Israel being setup in the first place.

    I'm not saying it is/has been right to kick the Jews out of place after place, but lets be fair about it, the Palestinians of the 1940's had a few surprises to deal with of their own.

     
  • At 12:37 AM, Blogger Kevin said…

    ...just in case you'd like to read the memo signed by Harry himself. I'm not sure the Palestinians got this one:

    http://www.trumanlibrary.org/photos/israel.jpg

     
  • At 5:40 AM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    Nor did Palestine need a memo. The Jews were the ones getting exterminated in 1948, and they had more sympathy. Also, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, the Palestinian leader, he was a Nazi supporter and no doubt his actions in WWII queered any deal for the separate Palestinian states.

    Although, you could also argue that there were PLENTY of Arab and Muslim states within a stone's throw of Israel. EGYPT, JORDAN, LEBANON, SYRIA, SAUDI ARABIA....

    I think one JEwish country would not kill these Arabs who were the majority in most areas, except where the predominant population was Jewish......

    I say, let the Israelis keep their land. The Arabs have plenty.

     
  • At 10:10 AM, Blogger Kevin said…

    hah

    Well now, I think thats rather hypocritical of you to say.

    IMO, You can't just selectively choose who should get something, and who shouldn't because of existing quantity.

    That's like the rest of the world telling us how much money we have and saying we should give more of it to help the world. ie: we're the richest, we should pay for everything.

    I know you disagree with that statement, and therefore, how can you say that just because they HAD land, it was up for grabs?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home