BUSH SAYS PATRIOT ACT MAKES AMERICA SAFER

Bush Says Patriot Act Makes America Safer
Jun 9, 2:40 PM (ET)By NEDRA PICKLER

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) - President Bush, facing efforts by some in his own party to scale back the post-Sept. 11 Patriot Act, says it has made America safer and should be made permanent.
"The Patriot Act closed dangerous gaps in America's law enforcement and intelligence capabilities, gaps the terrorists exploited when they attacked us on September the 11th," Bush said.

That is true. Work is still needed. I am glad there are no more attacks here, but there is miles to go before you sleep. Interesting how this evil act, has prevented loss of life on US Soil since 9/11.

Lawmakers responded to the 2001 attacks by overwhelmingly approving the law 45 days later. It allowed expanded surveillance of terror suspects, increased use of material witness warrants to hold suspects incommunicado and permitted secret proceedings in immigration cases.
Now, more than a dozen provisions are set to expire. Those provisions, among other things, provide authority for nationwide search warrants, enable the FBI and intelligence agencies to share information about terrorism cases and gave the FBI the power to obtain records in terrorism-related cases from entities such as libraries.

Interestingly the lawmakers are split among a Democratic and Republican lines. Those who want to keep it, were the moderate Democrats and most of the Republicans. Those who are NOW against it, are the Radical Democrats. "Voted for it, before I voted against it," to take a page from the John Kerry Page Book of Backpeddling. Some will say that Benjamin Franklin and others would oppose this saying, to give up liberties for unity and security is wrong. Well, that did not stop risking liberties to rebel against England. Also, to you libs who will blast this, read the FFs and read when and why they were talking.

During Bush' 2004 re-election campaign, he made preserving the law a common refrain, but he has rarely spoken of it since. His renewed focus came as Congress has begun working on the act's renewal amid fresh criticisms - from members of both parties - that it undermines basic freedoms.

He won didn't he? And before he won, most polled Americans did trust Bush more on anti-terrorism and security over Kerry.

Bush pressured Congress to make the expiring provisions permanent. His administration also is seeking greater powers for the FBI to subpoena records in terrorism investigations without the approval of a judge or grand jury.
"My message to Congress is clear: Terrorist threats against us will not expire at the end of the year and neither should the protections of the Patriot Act," Bush told more than 100 law enforcement officers.
The president credited the law with helping to bring federal charges against more than 400 suspects - more than half of whom have been convicted - and to break up terror cells in New York, Oregon, Virginia and Florida.
He spoke at the Ohio Patrol Training Academy to highlight the case of a Columbus man, Iyman Faris, who was accused of plotting attacks on a New York bridge and a Midwest shopping mall but was tracked down with the help of the Patriot Act.
Bush said Faris met Osama bin Laden in 2000 at an al-Qaida training camp in Afghanistan. Later, he received instructions from top terror leader Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge. Now, because of the Patriot Act, Bush said, Faris has provided information about al-Qaida and is serving a 20-year prison sentence.
On Tuesday, the Senate Intelligence Committee approved revisions to the law that would give the FBI the expanded administrative subpoena powers the Bush administration has been seeking.
But much of the debate in Congress so far has focused on possible limits to the law.
Sens. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., want to tighten standards for the law's so-called "sneak and peek" warrants issued without immediate notification of the target and for "roving" wiretaps, and to exempt libraries from provisions that allow FBI expanded access to records.

Two of the guys who voted FOR the Patriot Act. Now wanting to change it. I can see why in some ways. Down the road, if there was a power-hungry dictator, they could have carte blanche. However, the Constitution does not give that. Judges will forever be needed to write out arrest and bench warrants. Although, Mr. Craig and Mr. Burbin, what if this HAMPERS an investigation or even DELAYS the prevention of another deadly attack? What then?

The administration has warned that the Craig-Durbin bill would draw a Bush veto. The president did not repeat that threat, but he singled out the roving wiretap as an "especially important" tool that has been used successfully for years against drug dealers and others.
Bush also sought to defend the law by citing Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., who said she has looked into the administration's use of the Patriot Act and found no abuses.
"Remember that the next time you hear someone make an unfair criticism of this important, good law," Bush said.

George, you're right on that. However, expect plenty of debate and legislative rangling.

Lisa Graves, the ACLU's senior counsel for legislative strategy, said the lack of a documented case of abuse doesn't mean the law doesn't violate civil liberties. She said the Justice Department's inspector general reported that 7,000 people have complained of abuse and countless others don't even know they've been subjected to a search because the law requires that they be kept secret.
The ACLU wants the government to show evidence of a connection to terrorist activity before being allowed to search records.

And the ACLU is at it again. They really ought to team up with Amnesty International, since they are more concerned about the terrorists' and crooks' rights, than their fellow countrymen. Those who DO NOT break the law or do not do anything suspicious. The ACLU rant is expected.