Not So Young But Angry Conservatives Unite

Getting sick of the progressively worse slant and obvious bias of the media? Got booted out of other sites for offending too many liberals? Make this your home. If you SPAM here, you're gone. Trolling? Gone. Insult other posters I agree with. Gone. Get the pic. Private sanctum, private rules. No Fairness Doctrine and PC wussiness tolerated here..... ECCLESIASTES 10:2- The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool to the left.

Friday, December 08, 2006

Jihadist Mall Massacre foiled by FBI

Well, tis the season to be a motherf-ckin excuse for a human being for some people.....


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,235518,00.html

A man has been arrested by federal agents on charges of planning to set off hand grenades at an Illinois shopping mall on Dec. 22 as part of his plan to commit "violent jihad" against civilians.

Yes the mooselimb targeted unarmed civilians. Women, kids, old folks, and probably a few department store Santas. Thank God this piece of grabastic amphibian Shiite got apprehended. WTF are you so mad about that you wanna bomb a mall days before Christmas? Didn't get that copy of Muslims Gone Wild on DVD? Awww, poor baby.....

Derrick Shareef, 22, of Rockford, was arrested when he carried out a rendezvous with an undercover agent in a parking lot to trade a set of stereo speakers for four grenades and a handgun.

Grenades and a HANDGUN. I wonder what he wanted to do? Do an episode of punk'd? Nooooo, he intended to spread death and destruction in the name of the religion of pieces. And the silence from his fellow Muslims is defeaning......

Federal officials said he planned to place the grenades in garbage cans at the CherryVale shopping mall in Rockford, about 90 miles northwest of Chicago.

Shareef was charged with one count of attempting to damage or destroy a building by fire or explosion and one count of attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction. Officials say he was acting alone and there was never any real threat.


Send him to Oz, send him to prison to die a miserable death. Execution is too good, hand him over to a mob of pissed of Midwesterners, or better yet drop his ass in Brooklyn with a 9/11 Plotter sign. See the Italians give him a hands on welcome.

Bastard.

Yeah, we're still at war, libs.

9 Comments:

  • At 4:08 PM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    that's why he had grenades and a handgun.

    By the way, FUCK YOU very much.

     
  • At 10:03 PM, Blogger Marshal Art said…

    Of course, buffooney, being a very, very stupid man, and one who cares little for the wellfare of others, would sing a different tune if a guy like this one would have succeeded in his attempts. Or perhaps the idiot believes that we should wait until such jokers succeed before evaluating threat levels. Or maybe it's the number of dead that indicates whether or not the perp was a real terrorist. In any case, it's good that idiots like mooney have no part in defending our nation.

     
  • At 4:18 PM, Blogger Marshal Art said…

    Kevin,

    I believe they'll use whatever charge they can lay on a punk like this, whether he's on the level of bin Laden or a low level lone wolf.

    As far as cartooney's comments, he's only a stupid because he got caught. Do you think all the terrorists who succeed with their attacks are Einsteins? One needn't be a genius to pull a trigger or press a button or drive a truck loaded with explosives into a building.

     
  • At 6:32 PM, Blogger Marshal Art said…

    As yet another example of the very, very stupid man who calls himself "mooneyguy", I offer his last comment. What possible bearing on the discussion could a comparison between grenades and handguns have? Has anyone, anywhere at anytime suggested a heightened sense of dread concerning shopping at malls since this incident occurred? Are you suggesting that a wackjob seeking grenades to detonate in a shopping mall is someone that shouldn't arouse concern? Do you often confuse your head with your ass since both excrete so much shit?

     
  • At 7:34 AM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    Moonshine prefers people get killed, so he can blame his favorite scapegoat, the Bushes and the Jews. Moonshine is a vindictive coward who probably never served himself, albeit he likes to goad people into the 'if you didn't serve you can't speak' crap. John Kerry served, and he's a traitor. Same with Jack Murtha. Anyway, back to Moonshine wanting people dead. He prefers we wait for dead and dying, since it can blamed on this President. Never St. William Jefferson. Bush's second term has been abyssmal in many respects. However, stopping terrorism seems to be working. No attacks on US soil in over 5 years. Moonshine is only OK if Christians and Jews die, since he's a bloodthirsty islamophile and islamofascist. Moonshine doesn't believe in any holidays. He's the type who sits home and sulks while everyone else actually enjoys life. Likewise he would sue everyone else, so misery has company. Marshall, he probably isn't an American. He was unlikely to have served this country. And I don't know whether to pity to laugh at whomever would choose to marry him.

    OK, when a Palestinian straps dynamite to his chest, kills dozens of Israelis, that's a weapon of mass destruction. Iraqi does the same crap, packs a truckload of explosives and takes out a mosque, that's a WMD. Both the resident libtard moonface needs to get his head out of Mikey Moore's fat cavernous ass and back to reality.

    Let's wait and see. Yeah, that worked so well when dealing with Al Qaeda, didn't it President Clinton? Secretary Halfbright? Sandy Burglar? Nope, we got 3000 dead thanks to your stupid selves....

     
  • At 10:23 AM, Blogger NDwalters said…

    Killing more than 2 people is not a WMD? Causing structural damages to a shopping center and wounding dozens is not?

     
  • At 11:24 PM, Blogger Marshal Art said…

    Kev,

    I understand where you're going, but it's a matter of semantics. Why put a number on it? With one action one can kill one, as with the pull of a trigger, or more than one, the pull of a grenade pin, or the push of a detonator button, or flying a plane into a building. One action is more massive than the other and the mass of deaths may be greater, but mass destruction is a relative term. Certainly the average person thinks of nukes right away, and most don't even consider chem or bio weapons until more thought is given. But as I said earlier, to add another charge to jail an asshole like this Shareef, I'm cool with the broad interpretation. Chances are, if it was just a guy trying to rob a bank, they wouldn't use the term. But a Muslim doing the jihad dance? Yeah, it's a WMD. Now throw away the key.

     
  • At 9:56 PM, Blogger Marshal Art said…

    Well, Kevin, I feel pretty confidant that anyone who looks at this story in detail will understand what's going on with the WMD charge. But that's the key, to look at the story and get the facts. There they will see that the use of the term "WMD" is in regards to the charge used in the scumgag's arrest, and not so much a definitive description of the weapon of choice. I'm afraid your concern is a bit alarmist. And if you know of anyone who would be overly concerned due to this use of the term, give him a slap and tell him to grow up.

     
  • At 11:31 PM, Blogger Marshal Art said…

    As I'm sure you know, Kevin, the fact that Hussein never proved to the satisfaction of the UN resolutions requiring such, that he disposed of his WMDs that he did have and used against his people. These would also include each of the three major categories of WMDs that everyone in the world, including many big-mouthed members of the Democratic Party, believed Sadam had or was trying to procure. So in that case, Bush wasn't the only one full of shit about WMDs, just the only one with balls big enough to do something substantive about it. I think it's bullshit that people choose to forget just how widespread the belief of the WMD story was and like Monday morning quarterbacks now say that Bush was wrong. Seems a bit dishonest and hypocritical to me. Personally I think we'll find them in time, probably in Syria or some such place. But even if we don't, based on what the world thought it knew at the time, Bush made absolutely the right decision.

    As to the grenade issue, I would never have considered a grenade to be a WMD, I just think it's a good thing to call it when we're trying to punish a jihadist in our midst. Doesn't matter if he's smart or not, or if he can aquire grenades or not. The conspiracy to aquire and detonate a grenade in a public place for the purpose of killing as many as possible in the spirit of jihad, it's the same as a nuke to me. Book 'im, Dano. And ignore world opinion on the subject.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home